Rajput
A Rajput, derived from the Sanskrit term raja-putra, meaning "son of a king," belongs to one of the patrilineal clans primarily located in the western, central, and northern regions of India, as well as parts of Pakistan. Rajputs claim ancestry from the Hindu warrior classes that once ruled in North India, gaining prominence between the 6th and 12th centuries. Up until the 20th century, Rajputs held authority in the majority of princely states across India.
Today, Rajput populations and former Rajput-ruled regions are found across the subcontinent, particularly in northern, western, and central India, with significant communities in Rajasthan, Saurashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Jammu, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, Maharashtra and parts of Nepal and Pakistan.
Rajputs are divided into several main subdivisions, known as vansh or vamsha, which sit just below the larger classification of jati. These vansh signify distinct lineages, with the two primary vansh being Suryavanshi (descendants of the sun deity Surya) and Chandravanshi (descendants of the moon deity Chandra).
Each vansh further divides into smaller groups such as kul, shakh ("branch"), khamp or khanp ("twig"), and nak ("twig tip"). Marriages within the same kul are generally avoided, although exceptions are sometimes made for different gotra lineages. The kul serves as a key identity marker for many Rajput clans, and each kul is traditionally protected by a family goddess, the kuldevi.
Main Lineages
The Rajputs, who trace their ancestry to the thirty-six royal Kshatriya clans mentioned in the sacred texts, the Puranas, and the Indian epics “Mahabharata” and “Ramayana,” are divided into two primary lineages (vanshas or vamshas):
- Suryavanshi: Also known as Raghuvanshis (clans of the Solar dynasty), these Rajputs trace their lineage through Manu, Ikshvaku, Harischandra, Raghu, Dasaratha, and Rama.
- Chandravanshi: Also called Somavanshis (clans of the Lunar dynasty), these Rajputs are descended through Yayati, Deva Nausha, Puru, Yadu, Kuru, Pandu, Yudhisthira, and Krishna. The Yaduvanshi and Puruvanshi are notable sub-branches of the Chandravanshi lineage. Lord Krishna belonged to the Yaduvanshi lineage, while the Kauravs and Pandavs from the Mahabharata were Puruvanshis.
Each of these lineages is further divided into numerous clans (kulas), all claiming descent from a common male ancestor. Some of the main clans are further divided into shakhas, or “branches,” which follow the same patrilineal lineage system.
Each shakha, or primary sub-clan, holds a unique genealogical record detailing its key characteristics, religious beliefs, and original homeland. This record serves as a reference for traditional alliances and contains all information that dictates the rules of intermarriage.
Etymology of “Rajput”
The term “Rajput” derives from the Sanskrit “Rajaputra”, meaning “sons of kings”. Originally, it was a royal designation that evolved over centuries to denote a broader kinship and caste identity among the Kshatriya warrior class.
The earliest textual evidence of this term comes from the 3rd century BCE Pali text, the Khuddaka Nikaya of the Sutta Pitaka, where “rajaputta” is mentioned in a social context:
न ब्राह्मणो नोम्हि न राजपुत्तो,
न वेस्सायनो उद कोचि नोम्हि।
गोत्तं परिञ्ञाय पुथुज्जनानं,
अकिञ्चनो मन्त चरामि लोके॥
(Sutta Nipata, verse 457, Sundarika Bharadvaja Sutta)
This shows early conceptualization of Rajput as a lineage or kinship-based identity rather than merely a caste or occupation.
What is a Rajput?
By the Buddhist period, the lineage term “Rajput” began to signify not just a social class but a closed lineage-based ethnic group within the larger Kshatriya varna. Rajput identity is an ethnicity composed of multiple clan-kinship networks (kuls) and their subclans (khaaps).
The smallest sociopolitical unit among Rajputs was the Khaap, which was often named after the founder or the land they inhabited. These Khaaps were headed by a chief in a quasi-republican system and had strong land-based identities, which formed the basis for clan politics and governance.
Examples include:
- Kahluria, a Chandel Rajput clan from Kahlur (now Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh),
- Rohtak in Haryana, named after Raja Rohtas of the Mephawat Parmar clan,
- Bhojpur, established by Raja Bhojraj of the Ujjainiya Parmars,
- Mewar, ruled initially by Ahada Guhilots and later by Sisodia Guhilots.
Origins of Various Kshatriya Clans
Most Rajput clans first appear historically not at their formation but during their political rise to power. For instance, the Chavda Rajputs appear in historical records during the reign of Vyaghramukha Chavda (r. circa 628 CE), a ruler under Emperor Harsha.
By the 10th century CE, most major Rajput clans such as the Chauhans, Parmars, Solankis, and Guhilots are documented, with their subclans emerging over later centuries (e.g., Bundelas in the 16th century).
Many speculative and politically motivated theories attempt to link Rajput origins to groups like the Alchon Huns, but these lack historical and cultural evidence. For example, despite close chronological proximity, the Hunnic ruler Pravarasena and early Guhilot Rajputs show no political or cultural affiliation.
Similarly, clans like the Chauhans and Parihars have been attributed diverse origins - Huns, Sakas, Brahmins, Gujjars often influenced by political or regional biases rather than scholarly consensus.
An Ethnic Group or a Social Class?
Rajputs are often mistakenly classified as a social class or caste, but this oversimplifies their complex identity.
- Mere attainment of royal power or adoption of Rajput surnames (Rajputization) does not make one a Rajput.
- Historical Rajput clans such as Chauhans, Pratihars, and Bhatis have maintained their ethnic identity despite centuries of political decline and socio-economic changes.
- Rajputs are best understood as a closed lineage-based ethnic group, unified by kinship and cultural practices, distinct from social class or caste which are more fluid and open.
The concept of Rajputization has been politically exploited by some groups (e.g., RSS) to radicalize communities like Gujjars, Ahirs, and Jats by encouraging them to claim Rajput identities, often for socio-political mobilization.
Historical Overview
- Ancient North India was ruled by various Kshatriya dynasties and republics, such as Haryanka, Surasena Yadavas, Sakya, Moriya, Yousheya, and Arjunayana.
- Kshatriyas (Rajputs) exerted socio-cultural and spiritual influence, exemplified by the Nath Sampraday and figures like Lord Buddha (Sakya clan).
- The medieval period saw the crystallization of Rajput clans into their recognizable forms, with constant power struggles against invading Islamic rulers.
- The Pratihara Empire rose to prominence resisting Arab invasions and consolidating power in northern India.
- Rajput states often oscillated between resistance and accommodation with Islamic empires such as the Delhi Sultanate and the Mughals.
- The Mughal-Rajput alliance was complex and pragmatic, with Rajputs providing military service in return for political autonomy.
Conclusion
Rajputs represent a complex ethnic lineage group rooted in ancient Kshatriya warrior traditions, with a socio-political structure based on clan kinship, landholding, and martial culture. Their identity transcends simplistic classifications as caste or religion and continues to shape the social and political fabric of India.